|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Allan Crawford in conversation with Colin Nicolpart four |
![]() |
Eventually the partnership fell apart and, at the end of 1965, O'Rahilly's company, Planet Productions, took full control:
|
Colin Nicol: What happened with the parting of the ways. How did that
occur?
Allan Crawford: Well with the parting of the ways. We'd had such a see-sawing of
income - at some stages it had been sixty thousand a month, which was pretty good for a business in those days, but
it would go down to a few thousand a month, and really we had to have much more predictability to have a business going.
There's a point at which you either say stop or rearrange things and keep going. Of course, we had
rearranged it already once or twice, and the directors just felt that the interruptions we were getting from the
Postmaster General of the day in Parliament were disrupting our advertisers' confidence so much that we simply
called it a day and sold out to our partners at, really, for what we owed. In other words, to turn out honourably. But
in fact we did end up with quite a bit of cash in hand which was really too small, we felt, to return to the shareholders.
It was a derisory dividend of a return of capital, so we started to invest in the Stock Exchange in futures and what not,
and we were doing pretty well for a while. I don't know what it was that finally brought it to a halt. It might have
been the coffee crisis which cost Cadbury an awful lot of money. I had nothing to do with the investments on the Stock
Exchange. I knew nothing about it, although I was still on the board. I only took a director's interest. I would
call in at the meetings now and again and say well done chaps!. The reason that, eventually, the company
itself was wound up was because the principle shareholder had become Oliver Smedley who had been buying shares from
everyone else for pennies, and had therefore, bought control. And, he went broke, and because he was the principal
shareholder, the company had to be wound up. So eventually, from my few thousand shares, I think I got fourteen pounds as
a final breaking up fee.
CN: So you worked for all that and did all that for fourteen pounds?
AC: Well, for a lot less than that because I lost so heavily. I lost my music catalogues too
because I had to pay off other debts that I'd shouldered in the period and I ended up selling my catalogue to Dick
James merely to pay off debts, and I was still left heavily saddled with debts. So I wasn't very pleased about the
situation, but there was nothing I could do about it. I was more sorry for the people who'd been
with me who'd lost.
CN: So, on the Project Atlanta side, it could be said it was a risk venture and the risk
didn't pay off.
AC: Yes, that's right. There's every reason, looking back, to believe that it
should have paid off. The original prognostications were good ones, but the chaos that can be presented to you by
Government acting in the way that Governments do act - which is for political ..
CN: Expediency.
AC: Expediency.
CN: What about the Radio Caroline - Planet Productions, which was their operating
company side of things. Do you think very many of that side made money out of Radio Caroline?
AC: Oh, no. I'm pretty sure they didn't. I should have become a shareholder because,
with the money that was owed to me when we sold to our partners - to make life easier for the deal - instead of
demanding two thousand cash for part of what was owed to me, I agreed, reluctantly, to take it in shares instead.
But, of course, I was never issued the shares, and no matter what I did to persuade someone to do it, I was stalled and I
just didn't have the time or the interest to be bothered. And, eventually, of course - whatever happened to
those shareholders, I didn't even suffer that fate because I never got the shares issued. I was literally diddled
out of a couple of thousand shares. I do know that (director) Philip Solomon rang me once to offer me a shilling
a share, to take over the shares - in which case I suspect they would have been issued then re-issued to him.
But I refused that offer and never got the shares anyway.
CN: These would have been shares in Planet Productions?
AC: Yes, yes. So I don't know what happened to those shareholders. There was one
important little episode here that I've just remembered and it concerns the programming, because, as a music
publisher, one of the basic reasons that I'd started Atlanta was to get more honesty into broadcasting. To get more
competition, and this wasn't being supplied by the BBC otherwise there'd have been no point in starting a
commercial station. And one of the ways that I could see that we could get more cooperation out of EMI and Decca, who
didn't want us to have these ships, was to start broadcasting copies of the hits which would have made the public
start asking for those artists instead. It would push EMI and Decca into becoming fairer about what they agreed to give
and what not to give.
CN: So you produced a cover version industry.
AC: Well, I did this independently - it was my own business - but I produced a
series of records which, ultimately, when budget records came on to the market as LPs, became a very powerful sales tool.
What I was doing was predicting what the hit would be in a few weeks time, get an arranger to take that arrangement off
that record, get a singer that sounded like that singer and record them again myself. And do them as well as the originals,
if I could. And so my first record, which contained Love Me Do, the Beatles first hit, had six numbers on it as an
extended EP. Six numbers, three a side and selling for the price of one single. Very good value. This happened
simultaneously with us opening the ships anyway, and it was a marvellous tool to use to get cooperation out of EMI and
Decca.
|
CN: You were able to play their songs but not their versions of them.
AC: Well, we had permission to play my versions, because I was giving it. Had we continued
this policy of playing my copies, which were good enough to play, because they weren't crappy, compared to the
originals, the public demand would have been for my versions. That would have forced EMI and Decca into a much more
cooperative frame of mind. And, what happened? I heard that the records I was sending out to the ship were being
taken out to the rail and being thrown into the ocean so that the originals could be played. Ronan didn't have the
guts to believe the theory of it. Later on, every time an LP of my records in this fashion were made, it went to number
one on the hit parade. Every time. And the major companies eventually had to invent new rules to stop them being listed
in the best-selling LPs, because they were budget and copies and they didn't want them being listed, but
Pickwick Records would shoot up to the number one, Top of the Pops, every time they were issued which proved I was right.
They were very high quality. The public loved them and they were selling millions of these things. I think in
picking about a thousand titles for these over a period of years, I only picked one wrong one that wasn't a hit.
CN: Well, here we are twenty years later. Would you do it all again and, if you did, what
would you do differently?
AC: Yes. I would do it differently. I would have never have had a partnership with anybody
and I would have gone for more money and stuck it out. We'd still either be operating in the same place with a huge
business going or we'd have agreed to stop operations in return for say, a London license. Or something like that.
CN: Is that what you originally had in mind?
AC: No, no ..
CN: How long did you think Radio Atlanta would operate?
AC: Well, I thought that it would go for three years and that, during that time, we'd
amortise the investment and have a profit for the shareholders, and then decide either keep going, sell out to someone
else, or stop operation having made our profit, whatever.
CN: Did you ever expect that you might have been offered a land-based franchise?
AC: Yes. I felt that inevitably, once the public demand was proven for the product, that
there'd be no way that the politicians could resist the demand for the alternative, because I was satisfied that the
BBC couldn't supply it - even when we taught them a new way of programming. As it happened, they changed to
Radio One and everything - and took many of our DJs and did exactly what we'd taught them to do. Not terribly
well - I'm not very proud of the Radio One format but, certainly, we won the war because the Government -
the politicians - were forced to bow down to public demand.
Web-master's note. This interview took place in 1984, twenty years or so after the events
described. It is apparent from the full transcript that Allan Crawford had forgotten some details and was confused about
others. Some of his memories may not be totally correct but, even if they aren't, we feel the interview provides a
fascinating insight into the early days of offshore radio. It is patently obvious that Crawford did not trust his partner,
Ronan O'Rahilly. As it turned out Crawford lost control of his station so he may have been wise not to do so. But,
at the same time, it must be said that Caroline South under Crawford's management was failing. When O'Rahilly's
Planet Productions took over, at the end of 1965, the station's fortunes improved vastly and it became a very
successful and popular operation. The people who worked for Allan Crawford speak very highly of him. He was obviously a
man of tremendous vision who commanded great respect. Without his efforts, commercial radio may never have come to Britain
but, as Winston Churchill once remarked, history is written by the victors. O'Rahilly won - and it is
Caroline's place in history that is remembered.
With many thanks to Colin Nicol for allowing us to publish this interview.
Johnny Jackson's Radio Atlanta memorabilia is here.
Colin's Radio Atlanta advertising rate card is here.